Thursday, 7 June 2012

The Survival of Knowledge


The flow of information through society is essential for the survival of knowledge through ages and allows for advances in any given field of research. Whether it be the arts, sciences, medicine or law, the ability to expand, learn and grow all comes from the ability to share and communicate. To publish. This essay will attempt to explore how the invention of the printing press and E-Readers, benefited the science world in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries and in contemporary society.

One of the fundamental turning points in history would undoubtedly be the invention of the printing press by Johannes Gutenberg. This new invention allowed for the survival and renewal of old texts and the publication, and most importantly, the circulation of countless more. Information could flow through society a lot easier and therefore be worked upon, theories disproven or added to, and information and knowledge simply acquired. The following paragraphs will look at how the invention of the printing press allowed for a flow of knowledge through society and heightened the scientific world during the fifteenth and sixteenth century and to help illustrate this point, the focus will be on Claudius Ptolemy, Nicolaus Copernicus, and Galileo Galilei and how the publication of their works benefited one another.
Claudius Ptolemy, born in Egypt, published sometime in the 2nd century a work entitled, Geographia, a book which mapped the worlds geography in the Roman empire and had was thought to be lost, Niccolo Niccoli is said to have owned a copy which ensured its survival, until it was published again in the 15th century and brought back into circulation (M.Aston). What the circulation of this book did, some 11 centuries after it was originally published, was allow for an expansion of knowledge. As Margaret Aston states in her The Panorama of the Renaissance:

            'Renaissance geographers, who inherited Ptolemy without his maps and a keen interest in his methods for making them, made good their lack by not redrawing Ptolemy's world but also adding maps of their own - with places and continents unknown to Ptolemy.' (Aston, M 203)

This new ability to circulate information allowed for growth of information and knowledge. It is undoubtedly one of the most defining moments in all of the history of publishing.
Although the story of Ptolemy's Geographia is an fascinating one in regards to the sheer power which came with the printing press in its ability to reproduce and recirculate, it is not his work which ties with that of Copernicus and Galileo. A work he published entitled, Almagest, was the most definitive of astronomical studies for centuries and stated that everything in the solar system orbited the Earth (M.Aston). Though one finds it fascinating to delve into the complex works of these early pioneers, it is not the point of this essay to analyse the publications contents, only how they work with one another in time.
With that in mind, a jump forward in time of around 14 centuries is needed at this point. Now in the fifteen hundreds, Gutenberg's printing press has been changing the way information flows through society for just over a century when Nicolaus Copernicus, born in Poland, sent for publication his work entitled, De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium, which studied planets and their orbits and adopted a very new and unheard of approach to physics and cosmology, that which went against the grain of the time (S.Hawking). Copernicus stated that everything did not orbit the Earth, instead, everything in the solar system orbited the Sun. Although Copernicus' work was largely ridiculed as without merit, largely by the catholic church, the work was nonetheless in publican and his theories able to flow through society and reach the hands of yet another great astronomer almost a century later, Galileo Galilei, who was born in Italy.
Galileo was definitely a supporter of the Copernican theory and in 1632 published a book entitled, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems. This publication explored Ptolemy's theory in comparison to Copernican theory, and was very much in favour of the latter. This publication landed Galileo in a lot of trouble and he was branded a heretic, but nonetheless inspired many after him (S.Hawking). And was made widely available through print publication .

The reason for this comparison is to show the way in which information was able to flow across the world due to the invention of the printing press in 1440. Three men, separated by centuries and continents were able to learn and grow off one another. What the printing press did for science, and many other fields of study, in this period is is indisputably phenomenal.

In the digital age publications take on many forms and an analysis of what it means to 'publish' in todays society is a lot more complex then that of printing ink words onto a page. If only Gutenberg could see the way in which publishing has evolved since his printing press revolutionised the industry. If he could hold an E-Reader in his hand and browse through immense possibilities it provides to the user, he would be truly astonished. The next section of this essay will explore the uses of E-Readers and tablet devices and the way in which they have shattered the conventional ideology of publishing, being that of physical, ink publications such as books and magazines.
When looking through all which is possible through an E-Reader it becomes difficult to see where it benefits one aspect of society more then another. One browses through the categories on Apples AppStore and see's pages of categories of applications; games, education, business, news, entertainment, and the list goes on. It appears all aspects of growth and development in information and industry converge to a single point, you. The tablet device holder. And at alarming rates, twenty four hours, seven days a week to be precise. There is no stopping the flow of information in todays society.

To pluck a specific example from the multitude of applications and publicans which can be accessed from a tablet device seems redundant, however, upon acquiring a digital subscription to say, Wired, a magazine publication which reports on technological and scientific advances around the world, one can see the purely unprecedented reach, the information gateway that these devices provide to the user. What the printing press enabled for Galileo's, Dialogue Concerning the Two Chief World Systems, tablet devices, E-Readers and Wired, offer the everyday citizen; a chance to explore and examine, critique, analyse and even question that which governs the technological and scientific world which surrounds us all. It allows for a rebirth of knowledge and information from another’s publication, it is itself a digital renaissance.
A close look into the digital subscription of Wired shows just how effectively these devices enable a marriage of dense information and aesthetic wonder. The digital magazine is vibrant and animated, articles literally jump out at you, play music and are sometimes even narrated. The content becomes appealing to all which read.

Although Tablet devices and E-Readers are undoubtedly an ideology changing instrument, like that of the printing press, they are not without their flaws. Jonah Lehrer discusses in his article, The Future Of Reading, his concerns with the way in which E-Readers could have a negative impact on our understanding of a text. He states that technology always moves forward, benefiting and developing itself, and it will surely be the same with E-Readers. He then states:

            'making content easier and easier to see - could actually backfire with books. We will trade away understanding for perception. The words will shimmer on the screen, but the sentences will quickly be forgotten.' (Lehrer, J)

He then goes on to talk about this concern in relation to a study undertaken by Stanislas Dehaene, a neuroscientist, whereby it was concluded that easy to read text is interpreted by the ventral pathway of the brain, and more difficult text is interpreted by the dorsal stream in the brain, which is more active and aware then the ventral pathway and thus enables us to acquire more knowledge from a text. (Lehrer, J)
This is a legitimate concern which faces tablet devices and E-Readers, however, there are ways around it. As Lehrer states himself, possibly having the ability, as a user, to manipulate the text, make it more difficult to read, by dimming the screen or so on. Even with this in mind, who is to say that humans wont adjust to this new form of information digestion? Surely in the fifteenth century, Gutenberg's printing press made it far easier to read a publication then something which had been hand written on parchment with a quill.

The printing press gave information to society. Where It enabled a flow of knowledge the likes of which had never before been seen, tablet devices and E-Readers reconstitute it. They break down and rewire the way in which information flows from publisher to user, from user to user and eventually back to the publisher and back out again. It is a closed circuit of information, the snake eating its own tail.
If the printing press was the spark which triggered publication as we know it today, E-Readers are apart of the flame it left behind. As Aston states:

            'The legacy of recovered texts and the newly established understanding of Greek provided the essential base for more investigative, questioning, observational attitudes of the mind. The invention of the printing press was critical for this process. 'The printing press sowing knowledge', along with the invention of the compass and the making of gun powder, were commonly acclaimed as the three revolutionary discoveries by which the age (the Renaissance) was altered'. (Aston, M 204)

The E-Reader not only saw an easier, more efficient way of publishing, but a whole birth of knowledge, of understanding, which could reach the globe and inspire thought and development. E-Readers and tablet devices are doing much the same, except in an instant. They make information and knowledge accessible at any time and place.  The scientific world would not be where it is today without the invention of the printing press, furthermore, even this essay could also cease to exist for several reasons. Without the printing press information would not have been able to flow through society, knowledge and understanding would not have been able to grow and tablet devices, E-Readers, publishing, as we know it today, would most likely not exist.






Hawking, S 1988, 'A Brief History Of Time', Batman Press, Great Britain

Aston, M 1996, 'The Panorama of the Renaissance', Thames and Hudson, London

Lehrer, J 2010, 'The Future of Reading',

Naughton, J 2010, 'Publisher Take Note; the iPad is altering the very concept of a 'book', The Guardian,  < http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2010/dec/19/ipad-publishing-kindle-books-apple >

No comments:

Post a Comment